| |
Back
to Articles Menu
Neutral Site for
ArenaBowl is Fan Unfriendly
by Randy Snow
Originally Posted on ArenaFan.com, Sunday, August 22, 2004
The Arena Football League has approved a plan to begin
hosting future ArenaBowls at neutral sites starting next year, the same way the
NFL does with the Super Bowl. Personally, I think this is a bad decision. For 18
seasons, the AFL team with the best record has hosted the championship game and
they should, because they’ve earned it. It was a way of rewarding the hometown
fans that supported their team all season long.
In 2001, the Grand Rapids
Rampage had the best record and hosted the Nashville Kats in Arena Bowl XV in
the smallest stadium in the league. The Van Andel Arena held 11,217 for the
championship game, the smallest crowd ever for an ArenaBowl. That was also the
year that I first became a season ticket holder of the Rampage and I was there
for the entire season, including both playoff games and the ArenaBowl. After the
Rampage won the game, Commissioner David Baker got up on the stage, presented
the trophy and told the delirious home crowd, “Grand Rapids, you ARE a major
league city.” It was a magical season I will never forget.
The night before ArenaBowl XV, league owners held a meeting in Grand Rapids and
it was there that they voted to award an expansion franchise to Denver. The
ownership group included former Denver Broncos quarterback John Elway, who was
in attendance at the ArenaBowl game the next day. What a thrill it was to have
the ArenaBowl in Grand Rapids, and televised nationally in ABC as well! Now it
seems that that experience may never happen in Grand Rapids again.
Is having the Arena Bowl in a neutral site in the best interest of the fans? Can
the average fan in New York afford to get on a plane and fly to Los Angeles on a
week’s notice to attend their team’s championship game, if that’s where
the Arena Bowl happens to be that year? Or vice versa? The big losers in all
this will be the fans and players of the team with the best record. Maybe we
need to add a new article to the AFL Fans’ Bill of Rights that says, “We
believe that fans of all AFL teams have an equal right of having their team host
the ArenaBowl.”
Will the league be fair and rotate the championship game between all the cities
in the league? Don’t bet on it. In the NFL, they only award the Super Bowl to
warm weather cities, like Jacksonville in 2005, or northern cities with domed
stadiums, like Detroit in 2006, since the weather “up north” in January or
February is not the best for football. On the other hand, all Arena Football
teams play indoors and the championship game takes place in the summer, so no
city should be excluded from consideration, right? Think again. I’m sure there
are going to be “favorite” cities that the league will keep returning to
every few years. Even if they did rotate the game among all the AFL cities, fans
will get to see an ArenaBowl about once every 20 years of so, depending on how
many teams there are in the league.
I hope it never comes to the point where elite fans and corporate bigwigs will
be the only ones able to afford to attend an ArenaBowl game. It makes me shudder
to think of AFL cities possibly bidding against each other for hosting rights by
having to guarantee a certain number of hotel rooms and/or a certain number of
luxury suites, just like the NFL. If it comes to that, then the average fan will
truly suffer a terrible loss. Having the ArenaBowl at the best team’s home
stadium has been a matter of pride for hometown fans since the beginning. And
keep in mind that of the 38 Super Bowls played to date, no NFL team has ever
played in their own stadium before their home crowd!
Home field advantage has not been a major factor in the outcome of the
ArenaBowls either. The home teams have won 9 and lost 9 of the 18 ArenaBowls,
including this year’s game in which San Jose beat Arizona in Arizona.
As a Rampage season ticket holder in 2001, I also had first choice of purchasing
extra tickets for all the team’s home playoff games, and even the ArenaBowl,
on top of the seats I already owned, even before they were made available to the
general public. That was a perk that I appreciated and made good use of. It
helped to solidify my love of the entire Arena Football experience.
Over the last few years, AFL franchises have been awarded or moved to several
NFL cities, most recently Atlanta, Dallas, Philadelphia, New Orleans and
Nashville. NFL owners are also buying into AFL teams, but does the league need
to fashion itself after the NFL to survive? I say no. Fans have come to love the
AFL because it is what it is, a high scoring game where fans are close to the
action and can interact with players and coaches after every game. The league
has grown steadily since its first season in 1987, when there were only four
teams, by being a unique brand of football that is different and exciting to
watch. It had a loyal following long before it signed a national television
contract with NBC in 2003.
The AFL will never equal or rival the NFL and there’s nothing wrong with that,
but moving the ArenaBowl to a neutral site is simply wrong. It is the fans, and
especially the season ticket holders, who have made this sport and this league
what it is today and they deserve the chance to see their team host the biggest
game of the year.
Back
to Articles Menu
|